Sunday, 28 January 2018

Gran Turismo Sport - A wishlist

Image is my own from Gran Turismo Sport (Polyphony Digital)
Hello you, my name is Luca but you can call me Luca. I am well aware that I have been absent for a while now, and I left on a very sour note, I can only apologise but it was how I was feeling. But today, I wish to jump back on this train in order to write about something I know I can talk about. So in my downtime, I have been playing a lot of Gran Turismo Sport, and if you read my last blog post about racing then you'd know I have some grievances with it. Well this is an expansion of that plus a few more additions that I think would really help the game.

Okay so first up, one of the best things about GT Sport is the livery editor and its social features. As you can see above, that is a Red Bull livery Aston Martin Vantage GT3 car that I have personally created, and that is just one out of the amazing many types of liveries you can have. I have downloaded liveries that range from a Mercedes SLS GT3 car with the 2009 F1 championship winning Brawn team colour scheme, to a military tank lookalike BMW i3 only just now. I have utilised this editor to create my own personal racing car that you may have seen already, a red/yellow McLaren 650S, as well as my friends Charlie and James who have a blue Audi R8 and a black/green Lamborghini Huracán. You get the picture.

You get the picture. You can create and upload your liveries to be shared with all fellow GT Sport players, and also upload decals that players can download and put on their own cars, like how I have the Pokémon Eevee on my McLaren. It's such a great feature, and if this wasn't in the game, I strongly believe that if this feature wasn't in the game, GT Sport would have died out. Or at least be not as popular as it is at the moment.

The one area that I feel Polyphony really missed the mark, is in helmets and suit designs. Like with cars, you can personalise your racing suit and helmet by giving them certain colours, but if you go to search on the Gran Turismo website for suits and helmet designs, it's tragic. Just all the same pre-set designs with different colours, it honestly is heart wrenching to know what this amazing community could have done!

We could have been able to download a Valentino Rossi replica helmet and overalls made to look exactly like Ferrari's F1 overalls with their Shell, Santander and UPS sponsorship etc., what was stopping them? I would love to be able to go on tomorrow, and make my helmet look like Dino Zamparelli's with my DHL sponsored red and yellow overalls. I really hope this is added in, come on Polyphony.

Next up is a certain car that I know would fill a void in the game, the Formula Gran Turismo.

Image courtesy of KudosPrime.com
This car has been in the GT series since Gran Turismo 4, and has been a car with great potential and concept but a tad underwhelming in execution, and as a result has unfortunately been overshadowed by other similar Formula style cars in the subsequent games, such as the 2007 championship winning Ferrari F2007, the 2010 Ferrari F10 and Red Bull's own Gran Turismo partnership producing X-cars.

However with Ferrari F1 licences running out and Red Bull's X-cars being way too quick to constitute competitive top level racing, I feel especially considering the FIA's involvement in GT Sport, the Formula Gran Turismo needs to return and be done right. Heavily based in design on the 2004 era of F1 cars when they were at their peak in terms of speed, and powered by a 3.5-litre V12 that exceeds 18,000rpm and produces over 900 horsepower whilst only weighing 550kg.

Whilst doing research for this article, I found that there has been other GT original single seaters but I won't discuss more about them, considering the idea of only the one single seater would avert some confusion. There are some things I would want to change to make the Formula Gran Turismo even better.

The sound of the FGT is incredibly below par, it sounds more like a V6 or V8 turbo at best, not a naturally aspirated V12 screamer so one change I'd make is look to the V12 powered Ferrari F1 cars of the 1990s, such as the 1990 Ferrari 641 driven by Alain Prost and Nigel Mansell, or the 1995 Ferrari 412 T2 driven by Jean Alesi and Gerhard Berger. Have a noise worthy of it being called a V12 like those F1 cars, and whilst you're at it, up the power to about 1,050 horsepower.

Secondly, GT Sport has colour coded tyre compounds which are reminiscent of those that Pirelli provide in Formula One. These colours being green for the Hard compound, yellow for Medium, red for Soft, Purple for Super Soft, white for Intermediate and blue for the Wet tyres, and I'd love to see colours used on the Formula Gran Turismo's own Bridgestone tyres. I would hope Bridgestone would allow this since Pirelli were the one to use colour assigned racing tyre compounds, just a small detail that would make it feel all the more authentic.

Cars like the Formula GT would not exist nowadays due to the increasing concern in regards to fuel and the environment, but in the gaming world we can achieve these incredible speeds and with the potential that the GT Sport game has already proven to have in terms of balanced and competitive racing in Group 3 and 4 racing, a single spec racing just like the Karts in the game but at the top level of racing, would be such a welcome addition.

I know fine well that the inclusion of a single seater in GT Sport would be great for the livery creators, I have already seen a Ferrari F1 livery on an Audi R18 LMP1 car and a McLaren F1 livery on Porsche's LMP1 car, the 919 Hybrid. I'll be creating my own and my friend's cars, fitted with our names on the rear wing like the old MSV F2 cars, and I know I'll be racing my red/yellow DHL sponsored number 56 entry.

Okay next up and this is the one that really is necessary, I spoke about it in my racing game article, the lack of race tracks in GT Sport is abysmal. We have some great tracks in the game, some great original circuits such as Maggiore, Kyoto, Tokyo and Dragon Trail and some great real world circuits like Suzuka, Bathurst, Nürburgring, Interlagos and Brands Hatch. We also have some crappy circuits like the horrendous Willow Springs, and just way too little anyway, we need more!

Image courtesy of gtplanet.net
I am honestly surprised that after GT5 and GT6, the FIA supported game doesn't at least have some top line FIA Grade 1 circuits. In the picture above, that is Gran Turismo 6 at Silverstone, why didn't we already have these types of circuits? We are starved of circuits on GT Sport right now, and with GT5 and GT6 having these top level circuits and the FIA supporting GT Sport, this is just such a huge missed opportunity.

Other than that, another means to put forward just how little tracks we honestly have, we don't even have many Japanese tracks! Normally you'd expect racing games to be full of circuits that are based in the developer's home country, like Forza with American tracks, Assetto Corsa with Italian circuits, Project CARS with British circuits, and past GT games with Japanese tracks, but we only have Suzuka in terms of real tracks in Japan.

So let me make a list of a load of tracks that are from the real world that really do need to be in GT Sport, and in brackets in which games they first appeared in from the Gran Turismo series. A lot of these I can do without but for the most part, the first few are needed for this game.

Silverstone, Britain (GT6)
Spa-Francorchamps, Belgium (GT5)
Circuit de la Sarthe/Le Mans, France (GT4)
Red Bull Ring, Austria (GT6)
Côte d'Azur/Circuit de Monaco, Monaco (GT3)
Laguna Seca, USA (GT2)
Fuji Speedway, Japan (GT4)
Indianapolis Motor Speedway, USA (GT5)
Twin Ring Motegi, Japan (GT4)
Infineon Speedway/Sonoma, USA (GT4)
Daytona International Speedway, USA (GT5)
Tsukuba Circuit, Japan (GT4)
Ascari Circuit, Spain (GT6)
Goodwood Hillclimb, Britain (GT6)
Pikes Peak, USA (GT2)

I originally had Monza on this list but since writing this, Monza was added to GT Sport on January 26th, getting there ever so slowly. Alongside this, I do think we also need a lot of GT original circuits that for whatever reason, are not already in the game already. Here is another list containing some original GT circuits that we need in Gran Turismo Sport. Again, brackets saying which GT game they made their debut in.

Trial Mountain Circuit (GT1)
Deep Forest Raceway (GT1)
Grand Valley Speedway (GT1)
Apricot Hill Raceway (GT2)
Midfield Raceway (GT2)
Autumn Ring (GT1)
Tokyo R246 (GT3)
GT Arena (GT6)
Kart Space (GT5)
Matterhorn (GT6)

There are many examples of circuits that have not been in Gran Turismo before that I feel should be, like Sebring and the London F1 circuit that McLaren, Sky and Santander made in 2012. But honestly the circuits we had here that have been in past GT games, these should be in GT Sport so if no more are ever added, I wouldn't mind.

Last thing I'd like to see added, I complained about it on GT5 due to the oversaturation of them but Super GT cars.

Image courtesy of www.touringcartimes.com
The Super GT series is a Japanese based endurance championship, and is the series that Jenson Button is racing in this year, and consists of two categories of racing, the GT300 category which mainly contains traditional GT3 racing and the category that I am interested in, the bespoke GT500 category.

Since the last Gran Turismo games, Super GT adopted regulations similar to that of DTM and like how DTM in recent years has the big three German manufacturers with Audi, BMW and Mercedes competing, Super GT is made up of Nissan, Honda and Toyota (although competing under the Lexus brand) in its top category.

The way that the DTM and Super GT cars are designed make them almost similar in cornering capabilities to lower tier single seaters, which is why I believe having the Nissan GT-R, Honda NSX GT and Lexus LC 500 Super GT cars would be a very welcome addition. Although with it, I'd hope we could have more Japanese circuits.

Back on GT5 when there was nothing like the Group 3 and 4 categories like in GT Sport, Super GT was the only type of racing we had and it was always something I wasn't at peace with. I have this major need for authenticity, and that's why I'd never want to race Super GT cars on anything other than Japanese circuits.

Not to say it's impossible to imagine a Super GT race on any track of course but I would much prefer having a wide selection of circuits in Japan to race these on, at least as far as non GT original circuits are concerned. I have mentioned circuits from previous GT games like Fuji and Motegi but I'd also hope the heavily underrated Okayama circuit would make its Gran Turismo debut.

Well anyway, these are just some of the things I believe we need in GT Sport to make it that much better. I do enjoy the game and as far as GT games go for the future, the ideas and execution for a lot of balanced racing such as BoP and the categories make this the best GT game of the bunch, it just really lacks content. It'll get there eventually, but this game as I have said before, feels less like a game with add on content but more an incomplete puzzle with pieces being given back over time. Could be worse though, I am glad the content being added back is not monetised, that would have been taking the piss.

Alright! Those are my thoughts. What are yours? That will be all from me for today, and if you'd like to tune in for more of my nonsensical rambling then either follow me on Twitter @TheLucaFormat or put your email in the 'Follow By Email' option on the right if you're on a computer, to have my articles sent straight to your inbox.

So until we meet again,
Luca.

Saturday, 30 December 2017

Hopeless

Hello everyone, I'm Luca. No funny intro, no quirky lines from me, I'm hoping to put forward a serious tone to you.

So this is in someway, my 56th entry on this blog if you discount my 'update' (By the way, my internet is fixed) and also an article I deleted that I wasn't proud of that I'll attempt to redo soon. 56 is my favourite number, so you'd think my '56th' article would be a positive one, and whilst negative is what I'd expect something that wasn't positive to be, I'd say it was real perhaps?

2017 was a year of realisation for me, and not for good. We all go into the following year with a resolution and it's always something we know we won't complete, that won't be the case for me as I'll always be striving to be a better person, you can hold me to that word. So it isn't self realisation that's bothering me at the moment, it's the realisation that the world is dominated by evil.

I have always refrained from using labels like that because I still truly believe that calling something all good or all bad is a weak thing to do, to pour all that's wrong with the world into whatever you disagree with and live in ignorance. Because what I have realised is that we can scream bigotry and human rights all we want, that whatever we have been told is morally right, that from an early age we are placed in front of the television or we listen to our elders and are taught to be respectful, what good is it?

Realising a lot of things in 2017, from something as personal as a director of my favourite movie really screwing with the fans of that movie, to also seeing how close we all are to seeing that moron in the white house really screw with us.

Having seen Star Wars: The Last Jedi for the second time today - I have some issues with it but overall it's a really great movie - but when I was watching it, I remember thinking about what the basic formula of a Star Wars movie has always been, the very basic premise of good vs. evil, the grey area inbetween the light and the dark and what makes either side of the coin. It began to hit me, what makes good and evil, doing good is fighting for those who can't fight back, and evil is doing whatever it can at the expense of those who can't fight back. Having asked myself that for years, I now know the truth.

I don't want to spoil the Star Wars movie for you guys incase you haven't seen it, so if somehow you haven't then slight spoiler warning ahead, the Resistance is down to only a few members by the end of the film. However despite that, you hear throughout the film that there's still hope even after what they all go through, that there's always hope that the Sith, the Empire, now the First Order will be taken down, they will not win. We lose ourselves in this arrogant view of "We will win against evil", but really, will we?

Back in around 2015 or 2016, I went to see Dave Gorman and we were treated to a supporting act from a comedian named Nick Doody, and he was brilliant. He spoke about the 7/7 bombings in London, something which hits home for me as my parents were there a year before that happened and could very well have been there that year instead for the same reason, and how the British spirit keeps hope alive, and I loved hearing that. But having seen terror attacks happen this year especially, I won't hold back when I tell you just how scary it is, but not just terror attacks but also the people that are in charge.

In America, you have a president who quite openly is discriminative against LGBT people, believes black people who protest against the American flag because of police brutality are sons of bitches and Charlottesville racists have some decent people, and also who has now deprived the poor of health insurance and will openly allow them to die because of poverty, what is America exactly? Is it its people or its money? Because I have yet to find a redeeming quality about the Republican party, no matter how hard I try.

I have come to realise just how this world really is ran by evil, that evil is defined by doing what you can but at the expense of someone who is unable to fight back. A cowardly way of winning. It saddens me, because along with that nutter known as Trump doing all of that, we also have legitimate fears that Kim Jong-Un is going to go to nuclear war with Trump, and I can't bare the thought of it.

The other thing I realised this year, your heroes can be just as egregious. Matthew Vaughn could do no wrong in my eyes, but it's almost as if he tried. After I found out he killed Roxy in Kingsman and the manner in which he did, I won't mince my words when I say that I did cry, a lot. I broke down in public, I had to go to a private place and get my mum on the phone, I was a helpless mess. You have all heard enough from me about my reasons for being so passionate about Roxy in Kingsman to last a lifetime, and whilst my petition is fast approaching 700 on its way to 1,000 I still can't help but feel helpless still and hopeless.

It still disgusts me how the Kingsman official Twitter accounts have joked about the demand to see Roxy, the Kingsman mobile game Twitter account even used Roxy as a means to entice people to play the game, saying "She is still kicking butt in the Kingsman mobile game". They know that they fucked up! I know of some people who have confronted Matthew Vaughn but they have been civil with him, like he's going to listen to someone like that. Mark my words, I will confront that sexist troglodyte one day, but the fact I say it means I have to act on it and I am going to find that difficult to physically do. I won't have any issue going up to him in person, I just have to find a way to see him in person.

Anyway, small little tangent there, but overall, powerlessness. Going back to the Republicans, when they passed that bill that deprived 13 million people of their health insurance, I remember seeing a video of a few protestors who said that Republicans were laughing at them, one even trying to have a conversation with another Republican politician and they ran away. A great irony of the Republican way is being a heavily religious Christian party, when Jesus Christ even says "Heal the sick, feed the hungry, care for the weakest among us".

I'm well aware that it may sound like I'm trying to do a hit piece on all Republicans, I'm sure there are some people out there who have either voted for the Republican party in America or identify as a Republican that don't vote that way just at the expense of anybody who can't fight back. I always want to see the good in everyone, I'm just struggling with those sort of people who don't have basic decency like that.

I say this knowing I'm not perfect. I have gone through life making shitty slip ups at the expense of people and I can't live with myself, and I say I'm going to be better not because I don't think I was not deserving of any sort of criticism, but because I want to continue to improve. It would be wrong of anyone to believe they have peeked, and I will always focus on improving myself, it's just incredibly discouraging to know that there are people that do wrong in this world.

Not really the people who do despicable things, but the ones who have the power and abuse it for their own good, we have seen more than the fair share of that in 2017. I am all out of hope for the better of this world, I will continue trying to be a decent human but I know that more people are going to have to die in order to satisfy the greed of these abusive people of power, and that upsets me, not because only is it happening but nothing can be done about it.

You elect a person of the people, there will always be conservatives with some legitimacy somehow, and the many bigots who we turn the left shoulder on and pretend they don't exist when they still do.

You trust someone you idolise to do something decent and they'll exercise their ego at the expense of a beloved character in a movie which on face value, doesn't matter but it really does to some people, myself included.

You have hope, that tiny little spark that will light the flame that will burn down your enemies, they still live in that similar bubble that means they'll continue to fight in the same way you will. In the end, we don't matter to anyone who doesn't care about us? Pass a law that will allow another corporate tycoon to buy another yacht at the expense of the health and pension of a Thomas, Richard and Harold, what can we do about it?

Write a blog post about how pissed off you are, what will it do? Don't be naïve. At the end of the day, what is it that makes us believe that we matter to them? We don't and we never will, we can't win by spirit alone, what is there to do? No point getting all wound up about it, we have no power. Remember my blog post about a voice with no power, Heyday films did respond to me and tell me they'll keep me in mind but honestly, I doubt they have, they probably just told me what I wanted to hear and dismissed me.

I'm sorry if this is bringing you all down, I needed to get this off my chest and tell you all that I feel hopeless. Another case of injustice in America is the FCC most punchable face guy repealing net neutrality, he made a very condescending video that used Star Wars in a segment, and that was when Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker) went to town on him, saying how the Jedi would fight for good and for people who couldn't fight back. That parallels really well with a casino scene in The Last Jedi that whilst a bit meh in execution, still showcased how people make their money at the expense of everyday folk.

This is why I feel lost, and almost devastated at the state of this world. I have a lot of good in my life, great friends and a supporting family who are very well off, and I know I haven't done perfectly in my short 21 years in life but I want to be better. I want to do good in the world, and that's all I can say to all of you, do good and do what you think is good, do good by your fellow person and when you see something wrong and the whole world is telling you that it's right, plant yourself like a log and do, not, budge.

That's the note I want to end this on, that evil exists and just do what you think is right. You have some amazing people in this world, like Edward Snowden who is in exile in Russia because of his 'crimes' when it wasn't a crime, Snowden exposed an invasive NSA practice of spying on everyone, and he did it because he knew it was right. Be good people, even when you're all out of hope like me, just do what's right.

Thank you all,
Luca.

Monday, 18 December 2017

Temporary delay

Hello everyone.

I know I haven't posted in a couple of days and that's because my internet for some reason isn't hooking up to my laptop.

I'm typing this on my phone incase you're wondering, downloaded the Blogger app. We got a new internet provider whose name I won't say as I don't think it's a fair reflection on them, and it connected to my phone, PlayStation, all of my family's devices but not my laptop.

Hopefully it'll be sorted soon and I can get back to posting articles for you lot. So if you don't hear from me beforehand, Merry Christmas everyone!

Until we meet again,
Luca.

Tuesday, 5 December 2017

Why I love Eevee

Image courtesy of http://pokemonwikia.com
Hello you, the name is Luca but you can call me Luca. So I bought into the Pokémon franchise back when Diamond and Pearl came out, and literally none of the others afterwards, and I had such a blast! I don't play the games anymore but if I did, I have my dream team which consist of the following; Lucario, Absol, Blaziken, Milotic, Togekiss and last but not least, Eevee.

Probably an odd choice considering the fully-evolved, cool and elegant Pokémon that you see one like Eevee, but there's a lot of person sentimental value in my choosing of Eevee, allow me to take you on a history lesson. Beginning when I first got into Pokémon, I really do wish I was able to tell you all how I saw Eevee for the first time but I can't but I will try.

When generation four material began hitting the forefront of my awareness, I had been watching from a distance at my brother playing all the generation two games (and subsequently having a Level 100 Feraligatr as a result) as well as all my other friends, I decided I'd give it a go. My parents bought me an out of date Pokémon game guide that went up to Generation Three and I gave it a flick through, and very few Pokémon really stood out to me. This was until I found Pokémon number 133, that being Eevee, the evolution Pokémon. (My mum believes it was because of my brother allowing me to have his Pokémon cards and an Eevee was in there, I honestly can't remember.)

What was it that caught my attention at first? Bare in mind I was a barely 11 probably at the time but I've just turned 21 now and my opinion is no less true, I just thought Eevee was the cutest thing I had ever seen. I adore its design, with the rabbit ears, thick mane, big eyes, tiny legs and paws as well as its big fox tail, there is nothing in Eevee's design that holds it back in my opinion.

But there was more to Eevee than just being cute, as I have already said that it's known as the Evolution Pokémon. Evolving in Pokémon is something I believe a lot of you will know very well but for those who don't, allow me to teach you; depending on particular circumstances, a Pokémon will evolve and result in becoming an all new kind of Pokémon, such as with the one that everyone knows being Pikachu, which evolves from Pichu if the bond between Pokémon and trainer is maximised and then can go on to become Raichu should it be exposed to an in-game item called a Thunderstone.

Different Pokémon evolve in different ways, mostly from levelling up as a result of winning battles but in most cases, the evolved forms always result in never steering too far from its previous form in regards to type. The Pikachu family remains Electric-Type throughout and it's very rare that you see a Pokémon have a vastly varied evolution chain, which is why Eevee is so unique.

Image courtesy of www.game7.de
Eevee can evolve into one of as of now, eight different kinds of Pokémon. Initially back in the first generation of Pokémon, the Normal-Type Eevee was joined by its three vastly different evolutions, which were the Water-Type Vaporeon, the Fire-Type Flareon and the Electric-Type Jolteon, all of which evolved from Eevee when exposed to a Water Stone, Fire Stone or Thunderstone. Followed up in the second generation, the Psychic-Type Espeon and Dark-Type Umbreon, both of which evolved when the Eevee has fully bonded with its trainer although it would evolve into Espeon during the day and Umbreon at night.

Skipping a generation and we arrive at four, and added to the list were the Grass-Type Leafeon and the Ice-Type Glaceon, which would evolve from Eevee should it level up within the vicinity of a Moss or Ice Rock located on a Pokémon game's map. Finally we find ourselves at the Fairy-Type Sylveon, the generation six addition that Eevee would evolve into should it know a Fairy-Type move and have at least two levels of Affection points from Pokémon-Amie game mode.

Eevee evolutions or as the portmanteau is, 'Eeveelutions', are incredible and if I had to pick a favourite out of the eight, it would probably be Espeon though I may have a different pick each day. It is said that Eevee's unstable genetic code results in its many different evolutionary forms due to the need to adapt to harsh surroundings, which is fascinating to me even though it's fictional.. sadly.

Also what is to say that with the juggernaut that is the Pokémon franchise at this point, that Eevee won't get more evolved forms? We may see a Dragon-Type called Dracoeon, a Poison-Type called Toxiceon or a Ghost-Type called Spookeon. But whatever joins the Eeveelution tree, one thing won't change, that being how I wouldn't evolve my Eevee.

I have always pictured myself as a Pokémon trainer with an Eevee perched up on my shoulder, because we can dream right? Boy wouldn't having Pokémon be real just be awesome? We have all had that thought, haven't we? I'd have my Eevee as my starter Pokémon, and yes I am aware of how much of a child I sound. But that never stopped me.

I'm also very aware of how much of a weird vibe this gives off because Pokémon has always been seen as a kids game, and I'm gawking over a Pokémon that is traditionally seen as quite girly since I'm only really supposed to like the cool Pokémon like Lucario, Absol and Blaziken. But I am not ashamed, because as I write this, I have my Build-A-Bear stuffed Eevee under my arm (Build-A-Bear is incredible by the way), and on my walls I have two separate Eeveelutions posters, and a few letters from my close friend Nadine. We both love Pokémon.

We will be meeting in June when I go over to her home country of the Netherlands to watch the MotoGP with her and I am so excited to finally meet her! She has drawn me a picture of an Eevee which looks incredible, she has also drawn us both as Pokémon, me as a Riolu (The pre-evolved form of Lucario) and her as an Eevee since I gave her the nickname Eevee. One time being in a Christmas card which looked like it was done very impromptu but still unbelievably detailed and emotive, and another time she drew a picture for my birthday last Monday that she has made plans to make it look even better so we can take it home and frame it.

Oh and lastly, I got her a Build-A-Bear Eevee wearing pajamas that its ears and tail can stick through that is actually sat on the end of my bed and we will be sending off to her house for Christmas. I have no clue where I was going with any of this now, I just wrote it all down and I don't want to get rid of it.

My point is, I'm not ashamed with how much I love Eevee. I used to get weird looks from my peers back in primary school but it's over 10 years later and will be another ten years and I doubt I'll grow out of it. After all, it's not how old you are but how you are old!

Finally as cheesy and cliché it may sound, I saw a fan edit of Eevee back when I was just getting into Pokémon, which was really inspirational to me. It was a load of clips from the anime revolving around episodes to do with Eevee and the Eeveelutions, and it was set to this song called No One by Aly and AJ, and seeing it as a 10 or 12 year old (Maybe even 11 lol), it was something I sat on at that point in my life.

The lyrics went something like "And I ask myself, who do I want to be? Do I want to throw away the key, and invent a whole new me? I tell myself, no one but me", and the song really suited the idea of Eevee as a whole. You have a Pokémon that has so many paths to go down in regards to what it can become, and whilst the whole world may tell you to be one thing, nobody should feel obligated to become anything other than the best version of themselves.

Ending this off, I want to know what is your dream pick of six Pokémon? If they were real, ideally what would be your selection and which one would be your main one? As you know, for me it's Eevee of course, Lucario, Blaziken, Absol, Togekiss and Milotic.

Also I highly recommend everyone goes to experience how Build-A-Bear makes their stuff. It's incredible to witness the amount of love, care and detail goes into making a Build-A-Bear, having made my Eevee when I went to Scotland having been really upset after finding out Roxy's fate in Kingsman to be cheered up with my Eevee cuddly plushie, it warmed my heart so much. I'll be heading back up to Build-A-Bear to have mine fitted with a sound device to make the noise an Eevee would.

I know it's seen as girly and childish but I'm a 21 year old man and it makes me happy. I will not compromise myself to maintain an image of forced societal manliness and close off my emotions for anyone, heck I've never held back before so why should I stop now? Eevee is one of the few things that never fails to make me happy, and if that makes me seem like less of a man then so be it.

Image is my own
Alright! That will be all from me, thank you all for reading and I hope you enjoyed it. If you want to see more of my stuff then either follow me on Twitter @TheLucaFormat or have my articles sent straight to your inbox, go to the 'Follow By Email' option if you can find it to the right of your screen.

So until we meet again!
Luca.

Friday, 1 December 2017

Making enemies

Hello you. My name is Luca but you can call me Luca. So I would be very naïve to say that this world was only ever full of love, it's unfortunate but we know fine well that there are bigots among us, and don't get me wrong, I will not stand for bigotry or discrimination in any way. But we are very quick to label someone as the enemy, and I do think it's wrong.

I won't go full Donald Trump and say "There are some fine people" among the Charlottesville protestors (Because really, there wasn't from what I could see), but I do believe the attitude of always labelling the slightest bit of opposite thinking as wrong, it isn't healthy. I remember watching a video with I believe John Cleese in it, and he spoke about how the most popular groups of people are the ones who rile people up with their opposing groups, and how the neutral middle man won't ever get anywhere near the support. This does ring so true.

Allow me to be transparent. I am a UK resident born in late 1996 so my first general election was 2015, and in both elections that have taken place whilst I can vote, I have voted for Labour in my region and I don't want anyone of you to send me an email saying how I've given power to the anti-Christ and that I'll be murdered by them because of it and I should have voted Conservative, none of that bullshit thank you.

This year's snap election was infuriating for me, not for the result but for the lead up to it, reading the very obviously biased newspapers and there was one columnist who had wrote an article pretty much demanding parents to prevent their children from going out to vote for Labour, which is disgusting. If I ever have children who don't vote for the party I vote for, the only thing that will make me question their choice is why they're voting for them.

In conversation with a close friend one time regarding the confusion over free speech and hate speech, it was really screwing with my head, but she told me something really clear to me that I honestly wish was so clear to me before. With all these people trying to legitimise a lot of hate speech and pass it off as "Oh you don't think they're entitled to being able to say anything, are you an advocate for censorship?". The very fact that this sentence was uttered is such a huge issue.

But whilst the most complicated questions in life should never have a simple answer, my friend really helped me here. The very clear answer to this question was, that unless what someone says is infringing on the rights of anybody, discriminating against them or just plain thinking that they are superior because of their race, gender or sexual orientation, that it's free speech.

I had been sitting on what she told me for a while and came to realise how toxic every environment can be due to the applied logic that everyone who doesn't confine to your beliefs is always the enemy, is just really self destructive. I find that hearing opposing views can help you see past the confines of your own echo chamber, as I do believe that it's quite destructive to only listen to people who agree with you and as a result, you could go your whole life doing wrong and you would never know by a count of your ignorance.

It's honestly quite sad that people who are on one side, seeing the other side as the enemy all the time in every case without fail. I for one am not going to become friends with someone, find out that they are Conservative party supporters and cut all ties with them, only if they were racist, sexist, homophobic, that's when I'd take an issue and I don't think it's wrong to think that way.

Another thing, why is it seen as wrong to try and think about something? If we always acted very impulsively without looking at the evidence, so many innocent people would be in prison. I am of the mentality that if something is everywhere, then it's also nowhere, that we become so desensitised to hearing an accusation that may very well be true, be we are always so ready to burn someone immediately even if it isn't true.

If let's say you're a strong Republican party supporter in the USA, I'm not trying to make you vote otherwise as this can be said for all parties as well, why do you support them? I know in the US, the Republican party are attempting to pass a bill to privatise healthcare which I think is an absolute disgrace. I don't think there's any excuse to deprive someone of healthcare just because they can't afford it, and having heard stories about people being unable to have treatment and dying as a result of not being able to pay for it, means that from an outsider's point of view at least, that the Republican party don't like the American people.

Then of course you have the people who voted Republican who are strong white supremacists, who are against LGBT rights, who want to defund or outright remove healthcare funds for anybody who can't afford it, who want to remove women or transgender people from the military, who discriminate against anyone who do not share their religious beliefs, you can't deny their existence. But at the same time, if someone voted for Trump to be president last year, you had people like that but then you had people who just needed an income, and we all need to sit back and think about why we support whoever we do.

If any of you out there vote for racists, or anyone who wants to redefine rape, or deprive people of basic rights just because of who they are, I don't put this lightly at all but shame on you if that's why you voted for them.

At the same time, not all political parties are perfect, like how the Democratic party in America are apparently more in line with sorting social issues as appose to getting the economy going for the good of the country, I believe in a good combination of both but definitely not at the expense of anyone for whatever they are. The fact that we have a president in office right now who is freely reposting stuff from a hate group is inexcusable, and I'm not going to give him the benefit of the doubt because we have seen people act impulsively and attack him for something that wasn't true. Again, if something is everywhere then it's nowhere.

But there's no excuse for hatred and bigotry, and the very fact that people in this world are of that mind-set and are so normalised in their own mind, that we are apparently wrong and unaccepting. To this I say, imagine yourself as the sort of person you hate for whatever reason, who you think you're better than, to think you don't accept them just because of what they are, not who they are, how would you feel?

Give people basic respect and basic rights. Treat others how you want to be treated, and don't stand for hatred in any form. Judge people on who they are as a person, not for their sexual orientation, not for their religious beliefs, not for their race, because everyone really is the same race, the human race.

The very fact I have to say it when it isn't just basic knowledge, it's unfortunate. But if I can end this on any note, it's just letting you know that you're entitled to any view you like as long as it isn't at the expense of anyone's basic human rights. Not everyone is your enemy, know what will constitute an actual bad person over just an opposing viewpoint, because these undermining efforts don't help anyone. When it's everywhere, then it's nowhere.

Alright! Thank you all for reading. If you're new here and fancy knowing when I next post, you can follow me on Twitter @TheLucaFormat or if you want all my blog posts sent straight to your email inbox, look for the 'Follow By Email' option if you're on a desktop or laptop as I don't believe it works on the phone.

Hope to see all of you back here soon, so until we meet again.
Luca.

Saturday, 25 November 2017

Best racing game of 2017

Image is my own from Gran Turismo Sport (Polyphony)
Hello you, my name is Luca but you can call me Luca. So I've gone on record as saying over the past few months, I have been obtaining new racing games, being F1 2017, Project CARS 2 and Gran Turismo Sport. Full disclaimer, I know there's also Forza Motorsport and Need For Speed Payback, the reason I am not listing them is because Forza is an Xbox exclusive and I don't have an Xbox, as for NFS, I'm not into that type of racing game, the only times I ever bought into the franchise were the Shift games.

Anyway, for the purpose of this article, it's F1 2017, Project CARS 2 and Gran Turismo Sport. All have their pros and cons, and I'll be going through them all one by one to let you know how I feel about all of them. Offering perhaps a perspective into what you may want to spend your money on, maybe even hopefully having the developers of these games see what they must improve upon. So here goes, starting off our list in chronological order of release, F1 2017.

Image is my own from F1 2017 (Codemasters)
Ever since the F1 titles moved over to the next generation of consoles, the driving feel has always felt very off. On top of that, a lot of the F1 titles made by Codemasters have had a lot of potential and never quite lived up to it for one reason or another, but for what the 2017 title is, it's by far the best F1 game both in terms of quality as well as quantity.

Immediately what puts 2017 up there is the inclusion of classic cars. Along with all the 2017 teams and cars, there is also Ayrton Senna's '88 and '91 McLaren (Though just so you know, the 1988 McLaren requires you to buy it separately, the only one that requires that of you), Nigel Mansell's '92 Williams, the V12 screaming Ferrari from '95, Damon Hill's '96 Williams, Mika Häkkinen's '98 McLaren, Michael Schumacher's two most dominant Ferrari cars from '02 and '04, Fernando Alonso's Renault from '06, Kimi Räikkönen's '07 Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton's '08 McLaren and finally, Sebastian Vettel's '10 Red Bull.

Having originally been introduced in F1 2013 on the Codemasters titles and having been absent ever since, but it really should be a mainstay of the F1 games as it does add so much to what is essentially a copy and paste yearly game pretty much. What was done with 2013 and is expanded upon in 2017 with the classic cars is that you are allowed to race them, and in 2017 the '88 McLaren and all the cars from the 90s are all categorised into a class separate to that of the cars from the 2000s since the performance gap is that much bigger.

Also with the typical track selection, you also get shorter versions of tracks such as Bahrain, Silverstone, Suzuka and USA. Slightly disappointed that we have these instead of classic F1 tracks that were in 2013 but I still find a lot of fun in them, in particular the short version of Suzuka which takes about 40 seconds to lap in a 2017 car, what I like to do is load up a multi-class race with the classic cars, get in a slower C1 car and try and take advantage of the traffic that forms from the C2 cars.

On top of that also, I really love the Championships mode where for example, you can do a Sprint Series where there are two five lap races per meeting with random grids, one-make championships or a Classic Season with classic cars on an F1 calendar reminiscent of early 2000s seasons. Along with that, you unlock invitational events that can include such modes as Checkpoint Challenge, Overtake Challenge and Pursuit, there is so much included that really do make it more than just the F1 drivers, teams and races, before we even get into career mode.

To a further degree than in the previous instalment, the career mode in this game is incredible. Along with unlocking the invitational events, the career mode is heavily invested on developing your car via the resource points you earn for participating in practice programs, where you can improve aerodynamics, the engine, the chassis and overall sustainability. You're always looking to keep developing your car, keeps you invested.

This is before I get to talking about the driving, it feels so much better than the previous two instalments of the F1 game. Putting this into context, I use a Logitech G29 wheel for my car racing games but I did play with the controller for F1 2015 and F1 2016, getting my wheel last year and I did so some driving on F1 2016 and I have to say, the handling model was appalling on those games. On F1 2017, you actually feel the weight of the car all around and you know where your wheels are, it's not just understeering and has absolutely no lack of feel at all.

Of course though I must address the fact that this game being an F1 title, it's not as free as something like Project CARS 2 or Gran Turismo Sport in regards to what it can do and include, but as far as an enjoyable racing game goes then it's definitely up there and I'd highly recommend it if that was what you were seeking. I have some very minor tweaks I'd like to see with the next F1 game, they're relatively small.

One of them is, a bit more authenticity with the way our drivers are presented. If I could point out the photo I used for the top of this section talking about F1 2017, that is an image of myself in a Ferrari next to Lewis Hamilton in his Mercedes. You can tell it's me because the race number is 56, and Ferrari's drivers Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Räikkönen's race numbers are 5 and 7. But my helmet is a copy and paste, my red and yellow helmet isn't branded as it should and I'd love to see that worked on in the next game.

What I mean by that is, if I raced for Ferrari then my red and yellow design would be coated with the Ferrari logo above the visor, with Santander and Shell V-Power along with all the brands that sponsor Ferrari that you will find on their current driver's helmets. But if I switched to Mercedes, their badge above the visor with Monster Energy on either side and Petronas on top of the visor too etc. you get the point. It's a small detail but I'd love to see that, I'm amazed it has not already happened yet.

Same little details go for the driver identification. On a lot of the F1 cars are the three letter abbreviations for drivers, and you're asked to type out yours when you create a driver, I use LMR as mine but on Ferrari's car they don't show it. However if I drove for Renault or Haas, I'd like to see LMR written wherever they have the three letters, which is very nit-picky I know. Moving on.

Other things I'd love to see improved or reintroduced, on F1 2012 and F1 2013, there was the young driver test at the Yas Marina circuit, which acted as a demo and whilst I don't believe it should be forced, maybe have it as an option once you have created your character. It could give you incentive to do it by giving you resource and career points, and perhaps have it forge paths and narrow down team selection. I know there's a system in place on the current F1 games that teams will look at you and think higher or lower of you depending on what you do in races, maybe depending on who you drive for in the young driver test depends on what teams are more likely to be interested.

Something I've blabbed on about for a while now in regards to F1 games, I miss that incredible atmosphere that F1 2010 brought. It always looked so amazing both with how refined the graphics were when you were placed in the pit lane, teamed with the soothing music, I really do hope that the main menu in the next F1 game is reminiscent to that of F1 2010, I want to feel like I'm in the F1 world.

Final thing they need to re-add, split screen. They made a big deal out of it in past F1 games, it needs to return, and with Rocket League allowing split screen online as well, I believe it's necessary as my friend Matthew will often pair up with me on Rocket League and we will go online. Whether it be on my PS4 where he's labelled as my PSN ID with a (2) next to it or if I'm at his place and we are on his Xbox.

If you lot want an overall final conclusion for F1 2017 as to whether you should buy it, here's what I would say. It is the ultimate F1 enthusiasts game, it aims itself as being accessible by everyone but to truly appreciate it, you really have to be a Formula One fan, going off how the development influences your performance in career mode and the selection of classic cars, if it had none of that like F1 2015 then I would not recommend picking it up. But F1 2017 is the best F1 game that Codemasters has produced so by all means, F1 fans, pick up your copy of F1 2017 for Christmas.

Now onto number two, and one that I'm still conflicted over, Project CARS 2.

Image courtesy of www.solvetube.com
I really enjoyed the first Project CARS, it was catered more towards the motorsport enthusiast but I did understand a lot of the criticisms that it was met with. The handling model feeling too stubborn and that you couldn't drift, which I rarely did but I can respect those who do want to, so along with all of the content carried over from the first game as well as more features and promised major improvements, I was very much ready to play the follow-up and was convinced it would be the go to racing game. How is it? Well, as you can tell I am very conflicted.

Firstly I must say all the good in this game. There's so much in here, real-time weather along with a whole range of weather conditions to drive in (Including snow!), track condition evolution, rallycross racing, IndyCar and ovals (Which I have a whole new found respect for after racing them), and a career mode that really is reminiscent of a real life motor racing driver's just like in the first game. I also cannot speak the praises enough of the ability to have preset rules for all forms of motorsport to allow authenticity, and the ability to create and save online championships that can progress on for as long as you want, which is a huge step forward for us motorsport fans.

Of course there are road cars for those who love road cars (myself included) but Project CARS games have always been catered more toward the motorsport enthusiast and for the most part, it delivers and then some. However what does let this game down is the handling model.

I've been getting better as of late but it's very nervous and vague even when you're not trying to go so quickly. Personally I do find the braking to be very difficult, even with anti-lock braking I still find the tyres to move around when I am trying to slow the car down, and it makes it difficult to push. Plus saying earlier that the cars felt heavy on the first game, they feel like they've gone too far the other way on this version.

Not only that, but I can't really speak for controller players that much since I don't play Project CARS 2 on the controller but I've been told that the promise to make the handling on the pad easier for this version was not delivered. I did play the first game on controller for the longest time and I found it to be decent, but I haven't done that for the new game and I don't plan on doing so. However one thing that continues to plague this game, is user unfriendliness.

Something I personally criticised the first game for, there's so much that you can change and do to the cars that it almost feels a bit overwhelming. I know that when I raced on the first game, I couldn't set up a pit stop to have my pit crew do what I asked them to do in time for my car to pass my pit box and go back onto the track.

Overall, the game is awfully twitchy and having been getting somewhat the hang of it over the past couple of days, I still can't fully get my head around the handling model. Another really off-putting thing it tends to do is if you turn too hard, you get your side tyres developing a fuck tonne of smoke (I get this a lot in IndyCar oval racing, infact it fixes the tyres often in place), and depending on the car when you're braking for a hairpin, the car will squirm and lose mid corner torque. All very complicated stuff, and it would be considering the scale of this game.

I don't know if this game can have a quick easy fix to its handling model or not but what I can say for a fact is that Project CARS 2 is not for the casual consumer. This has the potential to be the perfect game for motorsport enthusiasts, being essentially a motorsport simulator, but aside from the major criticisms I have, there are things I'd love to see in the next game.

Something that Gran Turismo Sport has is a livery editor which I'll touch upon later, along with overalls and helmet colouring, this is something I believe could be expanded upon in Project CARS 3. Again with Project CARS' motorsport centred focus, this livery editor could perhaps work in a way that would make it possible to have your own team and you create your own custom liveries for the cars you race.

Again I cannot stop talking about the motorsport centred focus of the Project CARS games and its career mode in the first game was the best you could have in my opinion, and the follow-up did also include it though I must say, again as is the case with these games, there needs to be a balance.

The first game, I could not get the hang on the karting circuits and I did very much rush through the karting phase in the first game, though trading that for what you get in Project CARS 2 is no progression at all. If you wanted, you could just jump straight into the top of the motorsport tree rather than have to climb through the smaller ranks. I would very much prefer to begin in Formula Rookie, Ginetta Juniors, Renault Clio Cup etc.

Speaking of the progression system, small nit-pick but the choice to remove the Formula B car was a pretty bad one and to have the top of the single seater category be IndyCar when you had not only Formula A but also Formula X. I do think the single seater ladder needs some tweaks as IndyCar may very well be single seaters but not on the exact same ladder as the Formula championships.

I've already gone on about it before but for a game like this, I'd love to see a racing school that would perhaps place you in certain scenarios such as, when is the best time to change from wet tyres to dry tyres on a drying track or how to save fuel approaching the dying laps of the Indy 500 when everyone else is pitting and winning it like Alexander Rossi did last year. I know that Project CARS has a great toy box to pick from and the potential for this could be game changing, since it's no secret that the majority of the gamers aren't all motorsport diehards. I'd love to learn a lot about these things, rather than the boring cone slalom challenges on Gran Turismo games.

Overall, as much as I want to recommend Project CARS 2, I can't. Especially to the casual consumer, give this a miss but if you're like me with a force feedback wheel and a big motorsport enthusiast then you can work with it and I do hope it would improve, even though I expected it to be great from the start.

Last but not least, we are now going to talk about Gran Turismo Sport.

Image courtesy of https://www.youtube.com/user/PlayStation
If you've followed by blog for a while, you'll be well aware of how vocal I was leading up to the release of GT Sport which I will get to. Now I will say that whilst Project CARS 2 was a very difficult driving game for any casual gamer, GT Sport's handling model and online racing system does make it that much more appealing and accessible to the casual gamer.

Okay let's just talk about what I don't appreciate about this game, that I have been complaining about for quite a while, and that is? The lack of circuits, both real and original. The reason why this annoyed me was because in the last GT game (Gran Turismo 6), we had a whole bunch of great top-line FIA real world circuits like Le Mans, Spa, Monaco, Silverstone, Monza, Red Bull Ring, Fuji etc. and considering the FIA is collaborating to create online racing championships with this game, you'd expect GT Sport to have these tracks. But it doesn't.

Not only that but there's a considerable lack of GT original tracks, some of which I know would have been incredible with the racing that can happen in this game. This incredible racing coming from a sportsmanship system which will match you up in races with people who are as quick and clean driving as you, and couple that with the categorisation system that GT Sport has (Which I will get onto), it's just a shame there's such a lack of circuits.

That categorisation I just spoke about, is incredible. I remember back in the day, I really wanted to put together a racing championship between my friends and I but we lacked any sort of major racing category that would make it interesting, we only had Japanese Super GT's back on Gran Turismo 5 and it never sat well with me having them race on circuits that they wouldn't typically race on. If I still had that ambition and all my friends remained in touch, GT Sport would be the perfect game (If it had a decent amount of tracks).

But back on topic, you have the stock production cars labelled as Group N and are all split up via their horsepower into their own individual divisions. So any car you have that develops let's say around 300 horsepower are placed in the N300 class and only cars with any sort of figure of horsepower around that will be able to race alongside you, which can open itself up to allowing a load of cars pushing the edges of the horsepower whilst being extremely light. Road car races aren't that common but they happen and if you want to use your Subaru Impreza road car and make it as fair as possible, you are at least capable.

Then we have the racing cars. This includes Group 4 which is very basic modified versions of production cars, Group 3 which is a universally beloved category and a step up from Group 3 in terms of car model modifications and performance but still retaining the shell of production models. Both are very balanced and feature a variety of models, some of which are real life GT4 and GT3 race cars and the others which the manufacturers that create the models don't have a racing version of in either of those categories.

Other than that you have Group 1 made up of Le Mans Prototype cars, Group B which consist of Rally cars and finally the Group X category filled without restrictions, any car that doesn't confine to any of the regulations, everything from safety cars to the bonkers 400mph SRT Tomahawk X. You also have Vision Gran Turismo cars, a set of cars that were made in collaboration with the makers of GT and car brands, including that SRT Tomahawk car.

One major criticism though of GT Sport is the lack of single player content, since this game is mainly focused on the multiplayer aspect. However, as of November 27th (My birthday!), the game will include free of charge, new content to satisfy that corner of the community, and by corner I think I mean near damn well the whole room. I've said it before regarding the circuits but this is something that really should be in the game from day one. It seems like these days that games really are not complete and then tacking on extras, but more pieces of the puzzle are dished out every so often, mostly for a cost. Polyphony are doing great here in regards to adding content, Kazunori Yamauchi has promised that all content added to GT Sport is free and I do applaud that.

But this game as of now, isn't complete. I am obviously glad with all that is in this game and how incredibly accessible and easy on the user it is, but it does feel like a lot of what should have been in the game from the start isn't in it, just the basics, not anything extra.

Though with that being said, the social features in this game are great. You can create liveries for cars and share them online for other players to download, which I have been doing with my friends. I helped my friend James create a black and green livery for his Group 3 Lamborghini Huracán, along with my friend Charlie with an incredible chrome-blue livery with an immense arrangement of decals on the rear of a Group 3 Audi R8, and finally my other friend Ahmed who loves Mercedes so if he gets GT Sport, we created a Group 3 SLS livery consisting of his signature grey and orange colour scheme. Couple that in with my red and yellow McLaren 650S Group 3 car and I know we are going to have some great races. (You can actually see my McLaren, Charlie's Audi and James' Lamborghini in the picture at the start of this article)

I can say without a doubt that GT Sport is worth buying, and it's Black Friday weekend so it's on discount on the PlayStation Store so get it while you can if you want to have great and fair, balanced online racing but bare in mind that this game really doesn't have everything. You do run into a wall very quickly (not literally), plus the cars have to be bought with currency that you win whilst racing unless you win them on a lucky spin after completing daily mileage of completing a challenge (though I can say from experience, it can be bullshit sometimes).

But overall GT Sport is a great game and by no means am I saying that it's the best one to have in every circumstance and category. F1 2017 has great racing but is in its own little bubble, Project CARS 2 is immense and vast in scale but you need to be precise, isn't as user friendly and you need to be very into the complex side of racing.

However, I say this for you non PlayStation users, GT Sport is a PS exclusive and the Xbox alternate Forza Motorsport's latest entry is apparently very arcade-like in its handling physics but still maintains a slight sense of realism. It also utilises a very controversial loot-box system that have been mentioned in the same breath as Star Wars Battlefront 2 and the recent Call Of Duty titles, and I am going to write an article in the coming weeks about such a thing so stay tuned for that.

I can say for PlayStation users that GT Sport is by far the best game to pick but of course it all depends on what you like, and for Xbox users then Forza is probably also your best bet but don't quote me on it. We are all very deprived of range, really.

Let's say that on a graph, the left is arcade-like racing games and the right is very much simulator style racing games, where do we put these games on a scale? At least for console peasants like myself, you PC master race people with your iRacing, Raceroom etc. can shush for a moment. Need For Speed is very much on the left and it works for what it is, Project CARS is the right and a bit to its side but still on the right are F1 2017 and Gran Turismo Sport, then we have Forza Motorsport 7 which is slightly in the middle riding that line. There are different consumers for these different games.

As we are on Black Friday sales weekend and we are coming up to Christmas, take all of this information as you want but above all else, enjoy racing and enjoy it with your friends or whoever you meet in racing communities.

Alright! Thank you all for reading and I do hope I have helped you out here. If you are new here, either follow me on Twitter @TheLucaFormat or put your email in the 'Follow By Email' option in the top right if you're on a computer version of this site as appose to a phone. Hope to see you all back here very soon.

So until we meet again,
Luca.

Saturday, 11 November 2017

Streaming Service Takeover

Image courtesy of www.twitter.com
Hello you, my name is Luca but you can call me Luca. We all love binge watching Netflix, don't we? Assuming you have Netflix. What, you don't? Peasant.

Nah don't worry, I get it. You probably can't afford it and honestly with all the pies you need to put your fingers in these days, but that's something I want to talk about because with the understandable attitude of making money that corporations have, how much is too much? Well I can already answer that so allow me.

So to put this into context, I already have Netflix and Amazon Prime. My brother lets me use his Netflix and my parents bought into Amazon Prime, on top of all the sports channels that we have which eats into our savings, I try to remain as grounded and grateful as I can be in regard to what my parents allow me to have. But for the purpose of this article, I will talk about the streaming services that we have.

I wanted Netflix after I heard that Marvel were developing shows to stream exclusively on the platform that were all interconnected, they being Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Iron Fist, the team up show The Defenders and last but not least, The Punisher. I have gone on to enjoy plenty of other exclusive shows such as Stranger Things and Gypsy, as well as finding a load of movies I wouldn't have been able to find elsewhere. As for Amazon Prime, we got it after The Grand Tour was announced but I don't really use it for much else since we can't use it on any other device other than the TV in the living room, and I don't like depriving my parents of their own source of entertainment.

The impact that these services have had are really becoming a pain for traditional broadcasted television, since the modern day consumer doesn't align with broadcasting's placing of time, meaning it's more now becoming if a consumer has time for their media rather than the media having time for the consumer. Even before streaming services were popularised, I remember my parents buying a Sky box for our TV when I was young because I wanted to watch Dora The Explorer right when the school bus arrived.

So with this growing demand in mind for streaming services, it seems that every single production company now want a bite of the pie. This coming as Disney have announced that they will be pulling all their properties from Netflix and other streaming services, and placing not only their existing movies and shows (this including Disney owned brands such as Marvel and Star Wars) but also original content onto their own streaming service.

Now, this worries me ever so slightly. If I could liken it to anything, it's like Britain leaving the European Union or Catalonia leaving Spain, by that I mean it could spark a whole chain reaction of other production companies breaking off and making their own streaming services. All the power to these companies because I can't expect them to appeal to the convenience of the consumer at the expense of losing a shit tonne of money, I feel like there's a line that may be crossed here.

Just putting aside for a second the belief that Netflix may lose out big time, I honestly believe with the original series' and the small independent movies, that this could mean for a big boost for the indies and Netflix as well as all the other streaming services. I think they'll be fine, what concerns me is the possible hit in the pocket for us, the consumer.

Think about it, imagine a household of people who want to watch all these amazing movies by these studios as well as all these great shows they're hearing about, like that upcoming Star Wars TV show, but they're already paying way too much as it is. I mean, such a high profile show as Star Wars would probably be on top of their priority list but my point is, if Fox make a streaming service and Warner Brothers make a streaming service as do Universal and DreamWorks as well as Paramount and MGM, okay maybe a some of those wouldn't as they're a bit obscure.

Regardless, do you see my point? I call this the 'pizza' effect, no not the kind it has on me where I can't move for a few hours after consuming it. What I mean is, if you make the pizza too big with the same amount of cheese, then eventually it'll become hallow and not taste as nice. I'd hope that metaphor works because I think it does.

I honestly believe this will majorly screw with the consumer, with too much being asked of them for too little of a reward, I honestly think this will backfire. It just takes the companies big enough to be able to have their own separate service to do it before the much smaller money hungry people to perform a reactionary move, think the demand is there for their properties to be successful in their own right on their own streaming service, see how weak it does and temporarily screw over the consumer.

Again, I can't fault them for wanting to make money, it's how the world works, but there has to be a balance because if these companies try and break off into their own individual streaming services then we won't be able to pay all of them unless we were all very rich, which we aren't. This is why I have a proposal to make, and this applies to all streaming services.

Okay so let's say we can have an incredibly basic membership, the service is free (Hold on, it isn't all clear cut) but, advertisements play. I would hope people would understand that if they don't part with money, then they'll have to watch advertisements and I don't see that as a bad trade off, I mean one issue could be if someone installs AdBlock then maybe a workaround could be this type of membership only be allowed on gaming consoles or part of a TV package as appose to a computer which can utilise AdBlock.

I know that sounds a bit too good to be true and it probably is, an alternative would be paying an extremely small sum and still getting advertisements running, but maybe a free membership where you have to pay to buy the films or series that you want to watch, like what they do on YouTube. Which sounds shit, like getting a mobile game where it's free but to do literally anything, you have to buy it, but I don't mean it as in a progression necessity but more just buying what you know you want to watch.

If Amazon had it, I could just buy all episodes of The Grand Tour and be on my way. Maybe if I was interested in watching Preacher or definitely the upcoming Hanna series, I would buy those as well and not bother looking elsewhere. Maybe you could charge per series and only have access to them either on rent for a fraction of the cost for buying them completely.

I am of course trying to strike a balance between consumer engagement and corporate profit, I don't claim to be an expert in any of these areas of course so if there's a detail I have missed, feel free to tell me in the comment section below. That's the thing about me, I have the basic outlines for an idea that I wouldn't have proposed if I didn't see a benefit everywhere, and leave it to the actual experts to refine it ready for execution or discussion.

However, don't say I'm being naïve because I'm not, I know for a fact that the head of Disney won't read this and act on it thinking it's in the best interest. I'm just worried for the future of entertainment should everyone start thinking they need to divide everything into their own piece of the consumer pie and really screwing us over. That's why I'd like to see my solution implemented, but I know it won't happen, at least not now when the corporations have the dollar sign eyes.

If there's anything I'd like to end on, it's again that we need to be hopeful but remain realistic, this inevitable implosion of greed will be a huge inconvenience of us but as ever, we are all part of this environment and either it will destroy us or it will change. If we speak with our wallets, of course it will change but because of how I see it going, not only will it be a case of us having to speak with our wallets or refusing to bow to the system, we will just be physically unable to do so.

So let's brave this corporate storm and I'll see you out on the other side.

Thank you everyone for reading. As ever if you're new here, follow me on Twitter @TheLucaFormat and if you're on laptop, look for the Follow By Email option if you want to have my articles sent straight to your inbox. Before I bid you my farewell, I want to ask, if I gave this blog a new name, what would you guys come up with? I kind of want to include the word 'Blab' in there, I kind of like the word and it works with my articles being very much blabs. Keep the word Red in there, so right now I have Red's Blab. Not sure how I feel about it on its own, let me know any ideas you have.

Anyway, so until we meet again.
Luca.